Showing 1 - 9 of 9
This study re-visits the question of benchmark mismatch among 1281 US equity mutual funds and its impact on benchmark-adjusted fund performance and ranking. All funds report S&P500 index as a prospectus benchmark, yet 2/3 of those are placed in the Morningstar category with risk and objectives...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012950444
We assess UK mutual fund performance from a perspective of a peer-group, applying a novel approach suggested in Hunter et al. (2014). Our sample comprises of 817 UK long-only active equity mutual funds allocated to nine Morningstar style category peer-groups in the period 1992-2016. Overall, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012950746
Two recent augmentations of standard factor models in the literature enable investors to compute benchmark-adjusted alphas (Angelidis et al., 2013) and peer-group adjusted alphas (Hunter et al., 2015). We show that by and large the funds placed in the top performance quartile using either one of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013217584
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003924923
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011623949
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011960309
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012059737
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012207063
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014470970