Showing 1 - 10 of 10
This study re-visits the question of benchmark mismatch among 1281 US equity mutual funds and its impact on benchmark-adjusted fund performance and ranking. All funds report S&P500 index as a prospectus benchmark, yet 2/3 of those are placed in the Morningstar category with risk and objectives...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012950444
We assess UK mutual fund performance from a perspective of a peer-group, applying a novel approach suggested in Hunter et al. (2014). Our sample comprises of 817 UK long-only active equity mutual funds allocated to nine Morningstar style category peer-groups in the period 1992-2016. Overall, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012950746
Two recent augmentations of standard factor models in the literature enable investors to compute benchmark-adjusted alphas (Angelidis et al., 2013) and peer-group adjusted alphas (Hunter et al., 2015). We show that by and large the funds placed in the top performance quartile using either one of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013217584
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011623949
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011960309
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012292862
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012059737
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012207063
This paper analyses Smart Beta ETF performance and provides the first evidence on the funds' performance persistence. Our sample is comprised of 152 US equity smart beta ETFs over the period June 2000 to May 2017. We found that as per the risk-adjusted performance about 40% of Smart Beta ETFs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012835222
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014470970