Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015154513
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003894511
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010198905
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011706778
Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) announced a new approach to evaluating pay for performance in late 2011. This paper explains the new approach, highlights four significant weaknesses of the new approach and explains how ISS could substantially improve its Pay for Performance Model, now...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013079567
This paper explores five interpretations of “pay for performance”, presents a practical way to measure pay for performance and shows the extent of pay for performance at S&P 1500 companies. The paper argues that pay for performance has three dimensions: the sensitivity of relative pay to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013079701
This paper uses historical data on relative pay and relative performance to quantify three dimensions of pay for performance: pay leverage (a measure of incentive strength), pay alignment (a measure of correlation) and the pay premium at peer group average performance (a measure of performance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013079722
The competitive target pay policy sets a target amount of total compensation within a specified range of the amount paid to executive peers. If such a policy were widely adopted by compensation committees, we would observe a negative cross-sectional association between the stock price...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013403344
This paper highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission's (SEC's) proposed rules on disclosure of pay versus performance, makes several suggestions to improve the proposed rules, presents some surprising data showing that CEO pay is much more highly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013018820
The competitive target pay policy sets a target dollar number for total CEO compensation within a specified range of the amounts paid to a CEO’s peers chosen from similar sized firms in the same industry. If such a policy were widely adopted by compensation committees, we would observe a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014351180