Showing 1 - 10 of 12
In the empirical estimation of the relation between CEO pay and both firm and peer performance, researchers typically include conventional accounting-based measures that reflect firm performance net of executive pay expense. We analytically show that when firms evaluate CEO performance relative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013218451
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010229460
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014517913
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008857787
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014294255
This paper examines how changes in CEO risk-taking incentives are associated with changes in the use of relative performance evaluation (RPE) in CEO contracts. Using a shock to the accounting for executive stock options (FAS 123R), I confirm that risk-taking incentives and option grants declined...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012940307
We examine a setting in which managers have differential career concerns and firm performance is publicly observed using disaggregated measures that are incrementally informative but costly to contract upon. In such a setting, when do firms contract on aggregated rather than disaggregated...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014200278
We study whether relative power in the CEO-CFO relationship influences CEO compensation. To operationalize relative power of a CEO over a CFO, we define CFO co-option as the appointment of a CFO after a CEO assumes office. We find that CFO co-option is associated with a CEO pay premium of about...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012903005
The Evans, Kim, Nagarajan, and Patro (2010) (EKNP) study maps rich survey data into plausible proxies for an array of conceptual variables of interest. It documents novel empirical evidence of determinants of the use of contractible performance measures and demonstrates the importance of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013116075
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008857777