Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012796468
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002012576
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001928235
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008749273
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008908393
We show that if limit orders are required to vary smoothly, then strategic (Nash) equilibria of the double auction mechanism yield competitive (Walras) allocations. It is not necessary to have competitors on any side of any market: smooth trading is a substitute for price wars. Inparticular,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263094
We show that if limit orders are required to vary smoothly, then strategic (Nash) equilibria of the double auction mechanism yield competitive (Walras) allocations. It is not necessary to have competitors on any side of any market: smooth trading is a substitute for price wars. In particular,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264920
We show that if limit orders are required to vary smoothly, then strategic (Nash) equilibria of the double auction mechanism yield competitive (Walras) allocations. It is not necessary to have competitors on any side of any market: smooth trading is a substitute for price wars. In particular,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008578069
We show that if limit orders are required to vary smoothly, then strategic (Nash) equilibria of the double auction mechanism yield competitive (Walras) allocations. It is not necessary to have competitors on any side of any market: smooth trading is a substitute for price wars. In particular,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005593618
We show that if limit orders are required to vary smoothly, then strategic (Nash) equilibria of the double auction mechanism yield competitive (Walras) allocations. It is not necessary to have competitors on any side of any market: smooth trading is a substitute for price wars. Inparticular,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004989637