Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Five experiments demonstrate that experiencing power leads to overconfident decision-making. Using multiple instantiations of power, including an episodic recall task (Experiments 1–3), a measure of work-related power (Experiment 4), and assignment to high- and low-power roles (Experiment 5),...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010576391
Purpose This paper aims to identify and discuss four major sources of power in negotiations. Findings The four sources of power are alternatives, information, status and social capital. Each of these sources of power can enhance a negotiator’s likelihood of obtaining their ideal outcome...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014844617
The current research explores the impact of power on temporal commitment preference (an individual?s preference for shorter or longer time durations for agreements in decision making situations) across three countries: Portugal, Turkey, and the United States. A pilot study (N = 356) established...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008459782
Hierarchy is such a defining feature of organizations that its forms and basic functions are often taken for granted in organizational research. In this chapter, we revisit some basic sociological and psychological elements of hierarchy to explain why hierarchy is so pervasive across groups and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014047071
A large body of research suggests that many high-stakes decisions made by powerful organizational actors are plagued by overconfidence (Hayward & Hanbrick, 1997; Zajac & Bazerman, 1991). Extant research on power has demonstrated that the sense of power has wide-ranging psychological consequences...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014219832
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008666056
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003890805
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009006651
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009507159
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010401131