Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Davis, Haltiwanger, Handley, Jarmin, Lerner, and Miranda (2014) provide evidence that the impact of controversial leveraged buyouts on employment is modest. Our paper challenges this view. We argue that the sample tested in Davis et al. (2014) is not specific to controversial leveraged buyouts...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012920415
Bernstein, Lerner, and Mezzanotti (2019) was funded by the private equity think tank, the Private Capital Research Institute. It is not surprising that the private equity industry, through their affiliated think tanks, are funding academics to produce research. Having been labeled so eloquently...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014353575
This paper attempts to assist fellow leveraged buyout researchers understand nuanced details of corporate finance and leveraged buyouts, in particular. Given Haque, Jang, and Mayer (2022) is produced by esteemed colleagues at prestigious intuitions (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014362053
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011595911
Davis, Haltiwanger, Handley, Lerner, Lipsius, and Miranda (2021) continue to produce ex- tensions to the Davis, Haltiwanger, Handley, Jarmin, Lerner, and Miranda (2014) collection without addressing the critical research design issues raised in Ayash and Rastad (2017), Ayash and Rastad (2018)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013323755
Davis, Haltiwanger, Handley, Lerner, Lipsius, and Miranda (2019) produce an extension to the Davis et al. collection without addressing the critical research design issues raised in Ayash and Rastad (2017) and Ayash and Rastad (2018). First and foremost, the authors misrepresent their sample as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012860105
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012486065