Showing 1 - 10 of 42
In a model of simultaneous voting, Feddersen and Pesendorfer (1998) consider the possibility that jurors vote strategically, rather than sincerely reflecting their individual information. This results in the counterintuitive result that a jury is more likely to convict the innocent under a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013172468
This paper reports results of committee voting experiments in which a fixed agenda specifies a sequence of binary decisions. The outcome depends on whether voting is myopic or strategic. Subjects initially voted in accordance with myopic-voting rules; strategic-voting behavior was more prevalent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013122607
We consider a standard social choice environment with linear utilities and independent, one-dimensional, private values. We provide a short and constructive proof that for any Bayesian incentive compatible mechanism there exists an equivalent dominant strategy incentive compatible mechanism that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014179587
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014339775
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009491243
We consider a standard social choice environment with linear utilities and independent, one-dimensional, private values. We provide a short and constructive proof that for any Bayesian incentive compatible mechanism there exists an equivalent dominant strategy incentive compatible mechanism that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009739162
We use laboratory experiments to test for one of the foundations of the rational voter paradigm - that voters respond to probabilities of being pivotal. We exploit a setup that entails stark theoretical effects of information concerning the preference distribution (as revealed through polls) on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009740932
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009719107
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011888774
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011771488