Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Two heterogeneous agents contribute over time to a joint project, and collectively decide its scope. A larger scope requires greater cumulative effort and delivers higher benefits upon completion. We show that the efficient agent prefers a smaller scope, and preferences are time-inconsistent: as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012980151
What prevents majorities from extracting surplus from minorities in legislatures? We study an infinite horizon game where a legislative body votes to determine distributive policy each period. Proposals accepted by a simple majority are implemented, otherwise the status quo allocation prevails....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026561
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009703131
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003847382
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003748185
Two heterogeneous agents contribute over time to a joint project, and collectively decide its scope. A larger scope requires greater cumulative effort and delivers higher benefits upon completion. We show that the efficient agent prefers a smaller scope, and preferences are time-inconsistent: as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012936889
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003316264
This paper develops a dynamic model of legislative policy making with evolving, privately observed policy preferences. Our goal is to find conditions under which decision rules, which assign feasible policies based on the legislators' preferences, are sustainable in the long run. We show that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011897250
Two heterogeneous agents contribute over time to a joint project, and collectively decide its scope. A larger scope requires greater cumulative effort and delivers higher benefits upon completion. We show that the efficient agent prefers a smaller scope, and preferences are time-inconsistent: as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012455908
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014437606