Showing 1 - 10 of 10
We investigate experimentally the underlying motivations and individual differences with regard to the participation in between-group conflict in nested social dilemmas. In our nested social dilemmas, the collective is divided into two groups, and individuals allocate tokens between a private, a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010337030
Viewing individual contributions as investments in emission reduction we rely on the familiar linear public goods-game to set global reduction targets which, if missed, imply that all payoffs are destroyed with a certain probability. Regulation by milestones does not only impose a final...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008747599
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010378856
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011704189
To avoid the dangerous consequences of climate change, humans need to overcome two intertwined conflicts. First, they have to deal with an intra-generational conflict that emerges from the allocation of costs of climate change mitigation among different actors of the current generation. Second,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012844471
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012129554
To avoid the dangerous consequences of climate change, humans need to overcome two intertwined conflicts. First, they must deal with an intra-generational conflict that emerges from the allocation of costs of climate change mitigation among different actors of the current generation. Second,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012432260
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003936846
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009724618
Explaining human cooperation in large groups of non-kin is a major challenge to both rational choice theory and the theory of evolution. Recent research suggests that group cooperation can be explained by positing that cooperators can punish non-cooperators or cheaters. The experimental evidence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009751389