Showing 1 - 10 of 11
A ranking of journals is manipulable if a particular journal's position can be improved by making additional citations to other journals. We introduce a simple ranking method that is not manipulable and is invariant to citation intensities, journal scaling and article-splitting. The ranking of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008668738
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003937551
The evaluation of scientific output has a key role in the allocation of research funds and academic positions. Decisions are often based on quality indicators for academic journals and over the years a handful of scoring methods have been proposed for this purpose. Discussing the most prominent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009521668
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003811388
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009734918
The evaluation of scientific output has a key role in the allocation of research funds and academic positions. Decisions are often based on quality indicators for academic journals and over the years a handful of scoring methods have been proposed for this purpose. Discussing the most prominent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014171492
We introduce and axiomatize two quasi-orderings that extend preferences on a set to its power set. First, a modified version of indirect utility takes into account the number of maximal elements in the opportunity set. This rule meets Puppe's axiom of preference for freedom. Second, an averaging...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013060577
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010204081
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011927293
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011711498