Showing 1 - 9 of 9
We present a novel algorithm to rank smaller academic entities such as university departments or research groups within a research discipline. The Weighted Top Candidate (WTC) algorithm is a generalisation of an expert identification method. The axiomatic characterisation of WTC shows why it is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012440322
Sum of Ranking Differences is an innovative statistical method that ranks competing solutions based on a reference point. The latter might arise naturally, or can be aggregated from the data. We provide two case studies to feature both possibilities. Apportionment and districting are two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012212220
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013264832
A ranking of journals is manipulable if a particular journal's position can be improved by making additional citations to other journals. We introduce a simple ranking method that is not manipulable and is invariant to citation intensities, journal scaling and article-splitting. The ranking of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008668738
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003937551
The evaluation of scientific output has a key role in the allocation of research funds and academic positions. Decisions are often based on quality indicators for academic journals and over the years a handful of scoring methods have been proposed for this purpose. Discussing the most prominent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009521668
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003811388
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009734918
The evaluation of scientific output has a key role in the allocation of research funds and academic positions. Decisions are often based on quality indicators for academic journals and over the years a handful of scoring methods have been proposed for this purpose. Discussing the most prominent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014171492