Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010388011
<Para ID="Par1">Is there a strategically beneficial time for political leaders to make international environmental commitments? Based on the political cycles theory, we argue that leaders have incentives to delay costly ratification of international environmental agreements to the post-electoral period....</para>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011241848
Is there a strategically beneficial time for political leaders to make international environmental commitments? Based on the political cycles theory we argue that leaders have incentives to delay costly ratification of international environmental agreements to the post-electoral period. However,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010899743
Is there a strategically beneficial time for political leaders to make international environmental commitments? Based on the political cycles theory we argue that leaders have incentives to delay costly ratification of international environmental agreements to the post-electoral period. However,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010883828
Do countries interact when they decide whether or not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol? If so, what is the nature of these interactions? To answer these questions, we provide a theoretical analysis based on the notions of strategic substitutability and strategic complementarity. Firstly, we analyze...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009210938
Do countries interact when they decide whether or not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol? If so, what is the nature of these interactions? To answer these questions, we provide a theoretical analysis based on the notions of strategic substitutability and strategic complementarity. Firstly, we analyze...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009211256
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011471858