Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Individuals often repeatedly face a choice of whether to obey a particular legal rule. Conventional legal scholarship assumes that whether such a choice is made repeatedly or is a one-time event has no effect on individuals' decisions. In either case, individuals are expected to maximize their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014070478
This article uncovers the role of framing in the determination of negligence. Negligence disputes fall into two categories: cases in which injurers inflicted harm while seeking to avoid a loss to themselves (loss frame), and those in which they were seeking to obtain a personal gain (gain...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013294470
The chapter, in the Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law, discusses the contributions of cognitive psychology and behavioral studies to the research of tort law. These contributions, we show, relate to a wide range of issues in torts: from the basic decision to impose tort...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014142309
Principals use threats to make agents accept their demands. But what if agents outnumber threats? When negotiating with agents sequentially, a principal may have to forgo some agents to make threats against others credible. This paper examines a fundamental choice that such a principal faces: to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014347463
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012595240
Extensive literature has shown that assignment of liability for a single harm to multiple injurers undermines incentives for optimal care. As each potential injurer anticipates bearing only a fraction of the harm, incentives to take precautions are often diluted. The dilution-of-liability...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013251702
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000931704
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001193742
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001631999
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002798175