Showing 1 - 10 of 38
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010193571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012107476
A standard argument against specialized administrative courts in the tradition of civil law jurisdictions is their lack of independence. They are perceived to be ineffective in restraining the government’s interference with private rights, therefore failing to secure strong judicial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014174215
Medical malpractice law and tort reform are contentious issues. In this paper we focus on Italy as an example of a civil law jurisdiction. Italian medical malpractice law is essentially judge-made law. However, its effectiveness is likely to be curtailed by excessive delays in litigation....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014051016
In this paper we test to what extent the Kelsenian-type of constitutional judges are independent from political parties by studying of the Portuguese Constitutional Court. The results yield three main conclusions. First, constitutional judges in Portugal are quite sensitive to their political...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014216820
Although all legal systems use some form of prejudgment or post-judgment interest, there is no substantive law & economics literature providing for a comprehensive theory on the impact, functioning and assessment of the judicial interest rate. Mainstream legal scholarship has usually dealt with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012983736
Two important legal reforms in court procedure have taken place in Brazil recently: súmula vinculante (all courts now have to follow the reasoning of the Supreme Court in similar cases) and requisito da repercussão geral (the Supreme Court only hears cases that are of general importance)....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013100762
Specialized courts have become a key component of the legal reform packages implemented in civil law countries, particularly, in the area of family law. One argument for this policy is that they are able to reach a decision faster than the regular courts, which are normally congested. We use...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013148146
It has been argued that, under certain conditions, judges are motivated to engage in strategic defection against their appointer once they perceive the latter to be losing effective power. This behaviour should generate a clustering of decisions unfavourable to the incumbent administration at...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013074786
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010384337