Showing 1 - 10 of 33
Power market integration is analyzed in a two-country model with nationally regulated firms and costly public funds. If the generation costs between the two countries are too similar, negative business stealing outweighs efficiency gains so that the subsequent integration welfare decreases in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011395777
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001504350
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001209117
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001148909
In this paper, we discuss the choice for build–operate-and-transfer (BOT) concessions when governments and firm managers do not share the same information regarding the operation characteristics of a facility. We show that larger shadow costs of public funds and larger information asymmetries...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010664298
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001379900
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001146467
This paper studies the effect of soft-budget constraints in a pure adverse selection model of monopoly regulation. We consider a government maximizing total surplus but incurring some cost of public funds à la Laffont Tirole (1993). We propose a regulatory set-up in which firms are free to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014052152
Power market integration is analyzed in a two-country model with nationally regulated firms and costly public funds. If the generation costs between the two countries are too similar, negative business stealing outweighs efficiency gains so that the subsequent integration welfare decreases in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012966114
Power market integration is analyzed in a two countries model with nationally regulated firms and costly public funds. If generation costs between the two countries are too similar negative business-stealing outweighs efficiency gains so that following integration welfare decreases in both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013104162