Showing 1 - 10 of 17
Regulatory agencies are required to perform cost-benefit analysis of major rules. However, in many cases regulators refuse to report a monetized value for the benefits of a rule that they issue. Sometimes, they report no monetized value; at other times, they report a monetized value but also...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013003977
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010345026
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011893546
Over the past two years U.S. regulatory agencies have issued fourteen regulations that take into account the effect of industrial activities and products on the global climate. The regulatory activity so far has already set precedents on which future regulation will rest. Yet despite the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014192198
Politicians and commentators have from time to time proposed that regulations be suspended or delayed during recessions because of their adverse impact on employment. We evaluate this argument from within a macroeconomic framework. We argue that a case can be made for what we call...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012979650
In an earlier article, Regulation, Unemployment, and Cost-Benefit Analysis, we argued that regulatory agencies should incorporate the costs of unemployment into cost-benefit analyses of proposed regulations. We argued that alternatives to including unemployment costs in cost-benefit analysis —...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013007747
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011777867
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013454749
Over the past several decades, the Federal Circuit has been roundly criticized for creating overly formal doctrines that ill serve the interests of innovators and consumers alike. Scholars have suggested doctrinal corrections of all types, but the Federal Circuit's performance appears, if...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014189106
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001949685