Showing 1 - 4 of 4
This article, published in 1981, examines the two-part Midcal Aluminum standard for state action antitrust immunity. Under that standard, private actors are immune from antitrust liability if (1) they act pursuant to a regulatory policy that is clearly articulated by the state as sovereign and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013039491
In FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance, the Supreme Court denied antitrust immunity to insurers that had participated in state-sanctioned rate-setting activities. Applying the two-part Midcal test, the Court held for the first time that a state agency had failed to "actively supervise" private action...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207270
This article, published in 2001, argues that bundling of broadband transmission and Internet services by cable companies does not pose a sufficient risk of harm to innovation to justify a regulatory or antitrust requirement of open access
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207431
This article, published in 1987, responds to John Shepard Wiley, A Capture Theory of Antitrust Federalism, 99 Harv. L. Rev. 713 (1986). In an earlier article, I argued that the "clear articulation" requirement is the best criterion for "state action" antitrust immunity because it reinforces...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207445