Showing 1 - 10 of 52
This paper examines the regulation of technological innovation direction under uncertainty about potential harms. We develop a model with two competing technological paths and analyze various regulatory interventions. Our findings show that market forces tend to inefficiently concentrate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014635704
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014503087
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001488812
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001616848
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011378109
Since the passage of the Interstate Commerce Act (1897) and the Sherman Act (1890), regulation and antitrust have operated as competing mechanisms to control competition. Regulation produced cross-subsidies and favors to special interests, but specified prices and rules of mandatory dealing....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012465754
Since the passage of the Interstate Commerce Act (1897) and the Sherman Act (1890), regulation and antitrust have operated as competing mechanisms to control competition. Regulation produced cross-subsidies and favors to special interests, but specified prices and rules of mandatory dealing....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012777652
This paper reexamines the economics of two common features of credit card networks: the interchange fee paid by merchant banks, or acquirers, to cardholder banks, or issuers; and the restraint commonly placed on merchants against surcharging for credit card transactions. We show that the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013043304
More than a century ago, the federal government started controlling competition, first railroads through the Interstate Commerce Act and then the general economy under the Sherman Act. The Commerce Act assigned primary responsibility to the first great federal agency, the Interstate Commerce...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014055318
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003610602