Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Replication and constructive controversy are essential for scientific progress. This paper reviews the impact of all replications published as comments in the American Economic Review between 2010 and 2020. We investigate the citation rates of comments and whether a comment affects its original...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014000477
Reanalyses of empirical studies and replications in new contexts are important for scientific progress. Journals in economics increasingly require authors to provide data and code alongside published papers, but how much does the economics profession indeed replicate? This paper summarizes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012822347
This paper reviews the impact of replications published as comments in the American Economic Review between 2010 and 2020. We examine their citations and influence on the original papers' subsequent citations. Our results show that comments are barely cited, and they do not affect the original...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014362664
Reanalyses of empirical studies and replications in new contexts are important for scientific progress. Journals in economics increasingly require authors to provide data and code alongside published papers, but how much does the economics profession indeed replicate? This paper summarizes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012821096
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012199854
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014472143
Replication and constructive controversy are essential for scientific progress. This paper reviews the impact of all replications published as comments in the American Economic Review between 2010 and 2020. We investigate the citation rates of comments and whether a comment affects its original...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014228644