Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Two methods for calibrating discrete choice contingent valuation responses – the dichotomous choice with followup certainty question method of Champ et al. (1997) and the multiple bounded method of Welsh and Poe (1998) – are evaluated using data from a field validity comparison of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921184
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921227
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921233
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921237
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921312
This paper reports on an investigation of hypothetical bias and approaches to identifying and mitigating the bias. The split sample design includes an actual donation treatment, a contingent donation treatment with a follow-up certainty question and a contingent donation treatment with cheap...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005806763
We compare two approaches to mitigating hypothetical bias. The study design includes three treatments: an actual payment treatment, a contingent valuation (CV) treatment with a follow-up certainty question, and a CV treatment with a cheap talk script. Our results suggest that both the follow-up...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008508645