Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000824256
This paper examines how aversion to risk and aversion to intertemporal substitution determine the strength of the precautionary saving motive in a two-period model with Selden/Kreps-Porteus preferences. For small risks, we derive a measure of the strength of the precautionary saving motive which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013228024
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003831112
This paper examines how aversion to risk and aversion to intertemporal substitution determine the strength of the precautionary saving motive in a two-period model with Selden/Kreps-Porteus preferences. For small risks, we derive a measure of the strength of the precautionary saving motive which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012475006
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013424332
Risk aversion is typically inferred from real or hypothetical choices over risky lotteries, but such “untutored” choices may reflect mistakes rather than preferences. We develop a procedure to disentangle preferences from mistakes: after eliciting untutored choices, we confront participants...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013237655
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009127478
Risk aversion is typically inferred from real or hypothetical choices over risky lotteries, but such “untutored” choices may reflect mistakes rather than preferences. We develop a procedure to disentangle preferences from mistakes: after eliciting untutored choices, we confront participants...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013211721
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012391843
Risk aversion is typically inferred from real or hypothetical choices over risky lotteries, but such "untutored" choices may reflect mistakes rather than preferences. We develop a procedure to disentangle preferences from mistakes: after eliciting untutored choices, we confront participants with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012482227