Showing 1 - 8 of 8
In this chapter, we discuss the “lab-in-the-field” methodology, which combines elements of both lab and field experiments in using standardized, validated paradigms from the lab in targeting relevant populations in naturalistic settings. We begin by examining how the methodology has been...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012986659
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009732807
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011538671
In this chapter, we discuss the "lab-in-the-field" methodology, which combines elements of both lab and field experiments in using standardized, validated paradigms from the lab in targeting relevant populations in naturalistic settings. We begin by examining how the methodology has been used to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011489364
Many economically important settings, from financial markets to consumer choice, involve dynamic decisions under risk. People are willing to accept risk as part of a sequence of choices---even when it is fair or has a negative expected value---while at the same time rejecting positive-expected...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012834161
Understanding how prior outcomes affect risk attitudes is critical for the study of choice under uncertainty. A large literature documents the influence of prior losses on subsequent risk attitudes. The findings appear contradictory: some studies find that people become more risk seeking after a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013057795
We document a robust dynamic inconsistency in risky choice. Using a unique brokerage dataset and a series of experiments, we compare people's initial risk-taking plans to their subsequent decisions. Across settings, people accept risk as part of a “loss-exit” strategy—planning to continue...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014257706
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015403890