Showing 1 - 10 of 24
For quite some time long-only index funds have been suspected of being responsible for price increases in agricultural futures markets. This suspicion has prompted demands to drastically limit long-only index fundsʼ scope of activity. Such demands and their underlying diagnoses, however,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013060167
As a reply to our critics, we show that Bozorgmehr et al. (2013) have (a) misunderstood, (b) misread, and (c) misinterpreted the literature review by Will et al. (2012).
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011733867
This literature survey comprises 35 empirical studies published between 2010 and 2012 that analyze the influence of financial speculation on the markets for agricultural commodities. According to the current state of research, there is little supporting evidence that the recent increase in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012905196
This article sketches an ethics of (financial) speculation in futures markets. (1) It identifies an intentionalistic fallacy prevalent in moral criticisms of speculation in general and of financial speculation in particular. (2) It scrutinizes the degree to which the recent debate on financial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013074935
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010336332
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010200560
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010200569
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010200578
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009705412
Eine Auswertung von 35 Forschungsarbeiten über den Einfluss der Finanzspekulation auf die Agrarrohstoffmärkte gelangt zu folgenden Ergebnissen: Die weit überwiegende Mehrheit der Studien kann die in der öffentlichen Diskussion vorherrschenden Befürchtungen nicht bestätigen. Gemäß...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009680580