Showing 1 - 10 of 5,444
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011431021
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011437937
We discuss a method aimed at reducing the risk that spurious results are published. Researchers send their datasets to an independent third party who randomly generates training and testing samples. Researchers perform their analysis on the former and once the paper is accepted for publication...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013001788
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001565458
Credible Granger-causality analysis appears to require post-sample inference, as it is well-known that in-sample t can be a poor guide to actual forecasting e ffectiveness. But post-sample model testing requires an often-consequential a priori partitioning of the data into an `in-sample' period...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013063521
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010225520
This paper explores the implications of possible bias cancellation using Rubin-style matching methods with complete and incomplete data. After reviewing the naı̈ve causal estimator and the approaches of Heckman and Rubin to the causal estimation problem, we show how missing data can complicate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011434078
This paper studies inference for the average treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with covariate-adaptive randomization. Here, by covariate-adaptive randomization, we mean randomization schemes that first stratify according to baseline covariates and then assign treatment status so...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011309722
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011923045
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011776032