Showing 1 - 10 of 36
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011490427
Large institutional investors own an increasing share of equity markets in the U.S. The implications of this development for financial markets are still unclear. The paper presents novel empirical evidence that ownership by large institutions predicts higher volatility and greater noise in stock...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011514119
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012040010
Large institutional investors own an increasing share of the equity markets in the U.S. The implications of this development for financial markets are still unclear. The paper presents novel empirical evidence that ownership by large institutions predicts higher volatility and greater noise in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012992142
Large institutional investors own an increasing share of equity markets. We conjecture that a financial market in which large institutions dominate operates differently than a market populated by smaller independent investors. To support this view, we show that funds within the same family...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012456429
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001890296
Little is known about how socioeconomic characteristics of executive teams affect corporate governance in banking. Exploiting a unique dataset, we show how age, gender, and education composition of executive teams affect risk taking of financial institutions. First, we establish that age,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010308267
We test the implications of Flannery’s (1986) and Diamond’s (1991) models concerning the effects of risk and asymmetric information in determining debt maturity, and we examine the overall importance of informational asymmetries in debt maturity choices. We employ data from more than 6,000...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010397600
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001245202
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001597857