Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001857846
We solve for the settlement mechanism and fee-shifting rule that minimize the likelihood of litigation yet maintain optimal deterrence under the assumption that the main dispute between the parties is about the defendant's liability. The solution turns out to be surprisingly simple: let the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014114517
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015140266
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003230541
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003666841
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003666845
A risk-neutral plaintiff sues a risk-neutral defendant for damages that are normalized to one. The defendant knows whether she is liable or not, but the plaintiff does not. We ask what are the settlement procedures and fee-shifting rules (which, together, we call a mechanism) that minimize the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014063912
We compare three common dispute resolution processes - negotiation, mediation, and arbitration - in the framework of Crawford and Sobel (1982). Under negotiation, the two parties engage in (possibly arbitrarily long) face-to-face cheap talk. Under mediation, the parties communicate with a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010266269
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003876891
We compare three common dispute resolution processes - negotiation, mediation, and arbitration - in the framework of Crawford and Sobel (1982). Under negotiation, the two parties engage in (possibly arbitrarily long) face-to-face cheap talk. Under mediation, the parties communicate with a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003781465