Showing 1 - 10 of 24
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001750839
Schools often track students to classes based on ability. Proponents of tracking argue it is a low-cost tool to improve learning since instruction is more effective when students are more homogeneous, while opponents argue it exacerbates initial differences in opportunities without strong...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014077006
Current education reform proposals involve improving educational outcomes through forms of market-based competition and expanded parental choice. In this paper, we explore the impact of choice through open enrollment within the Chicago Public Schools (CPS). Roughly half of the students within...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013218709
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003379707
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003334715
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011581134
Schools often track students to classes based on ability. Proponents of tracking argue it is a low-cost tool to improve learning since instruction is more effective when students are more homogeneous, while opponents argue it exacerbates initial differences in opportunities without strong...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013362024
We explore the extent to which schools manipulate the composition of students in the test-taking pool in order to maximize ratings under Texas' accountability system in the 1990s. We first derive predictions from a static model of administrators' incentives given the structure of the ratings...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012761350
Firms and other organizations establish the criteria under which employees will be judged and the performance measures made available to supervisors, the board of directors and other stakeholders, and these structures almost certainly influence behavior and organization outcomes. Any divergence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012978098
Schools often track students to classes based on ability. Proponents of tracking argue it is a low-cost tool to improve learning since instruction is more effective when students are more homogeneous, while opponents argue it exacerbates initial differences in opportunities without strong...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013365142