Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003550429
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003967571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008856736
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003400403
According to Schumpeter, the creative process of economic development can be divided into three distinguishable stages of invention, innovation (commercialization) and imitation. We show why there is a rationale for the Schumpeterian entrepreneur to also include the inventor in the innovation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012746286
According to Schumpeter, the creative process of economic development can be divided into the three distinguishable stages of invention, innovation (commercialization) and imitation. Following this theory, invention and innovation require different skills. This paper tests whether the invention...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012825157
This essay argues that the economic contribution of certain firms – be they small, young or rapidly growing – has to be understood in a broader context of creative destruction. Growth of some firms requires contraction and exit of some other firms to free up resources that can be reallocated...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012906133
Based on a review of 700+ peer-reviewed articles since 1990, identified using text mining methodology and supervised machine learning, we analyze how neo-Schumpeterian growth theorists relate to the entrepreneur-centered view of Schumpeter Mark I and the entrepreneurless framework of Schumpeter...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014359148
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014433392
The neo-Schumpeterian growth models, which appeared in the early 1990s, have ostensibly reintroduced the entrepreneur into mainstream growth theory. However, we show that by ignoring genuine uncertainty and by assuming that profits follow an objectively true and ex ante known probability...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015175732