Showing 1 - 10 of 20
We show that in misspecified models with useless factors (for example, factors that are independent of the returns on the test assets), the standard inference procedures tend to erroneously conclude, with high probability, that these irrelevant factors are priced and the restrictions of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010195037
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010443073
This paper derives explicit expressions for the asymptotic variances of the maximum likelihood and continuously updated GMM estimators under potentially misspecified models. The proposed misspecification-robust variance estimators allow the researcher to conduct valid inference on the model...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011344636
This paper is concerned with statistical inference and model evaluation in possibly misspecified and unidentified linear asset-pricing models estimated by maximum likelihood and one-step generalized method of moments. Strikingly, when spurious factors (that is, factors that are uncorrelated with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011757568
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011791596
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012040404
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012136929
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013188701
Although it is of interest to test whether or not a particular asset pricing model is literally true, a more useful task for empirical researchers is to determine how wrong a model is and to compare the performance of competing asset pricing models. In this paper, we propose a new methodology to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013151012
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003776354