Showing 1 - 10 of 10
We exploit a 2008 regulatory change in a Canadian province to investigate the association between engagement partner identification (EPI) and audit quality (AQ) and to illustrate the implications of control group design choices on this association. In contrast to prior studies, firms in our...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012847687
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014468796
This paper derives the impacts of legal system characteristics and auditing standards on auditor behavior (audit quality), and analyzes the determination of optimal auditing standards under different legal regimes. Legal regimes are characterized by differences in the uncertainty concerning the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013035474
The extant auditing literature documents an inconsistent relationship between audit fees and market concentration. In this paper, we argue that the impact of market concentration on audit fees is auditor and auditee specific. Based on the fact that the audit services to an auditee are generally...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013216299
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010468725
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011429476
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011773330
Building on an auction model, we examine the economic consequences of audit retendering, under which the incumbent auditor in auction possesses both an information advantage and knowledge advantage over outside auditors. Audit retendering allows the firm to retain the incumbent auditor with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012863943
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014584607
Conventional wisdom holds that joint audits would improve audit quality by enhancing audit evidence precision, because “Two heads are better than one,” and by enhancing auditor independence, because it is more expensive for a company to “bribe” two audit firms than one. Our paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012975120