Showing 1 - 10 of 22
We test whether firms with a single bank are better shielded from loss of credit and investment cuts in periods of adverse cash flow shocks than firms with multiple bank relationships. Our estimates of the cash flow sensitivity of investment show that both types of firms are equally subject to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013137278
We test whether firms with a single bank are better shielded from loss of credit and investment cuts in periods of adverse cash flow shocks than firms with multiple bank relationships. Our estimates of the cash flow sensitivity of investment show that both types of firms are equally subject to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003358619
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003358897
We test whether firms with a single bank are better shielded from loss of credit and investment cuts in periods of adverse cash flow shocks than firms with multiple bank relationships. Our estimates of the cash flow sensitivity of investment show that both types of firms are equally subject to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003367995
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003818687
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001694539
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001497478
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001554432
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014112904
We provide empirical evidence on banks' responses to shocks in wholesale funding, using data of 181 euro area banks over the period August 2007 to June 2013. Banks' adjustments of loan volumes and lending rates in response to funding liquidity shocks are analysed in a panel VAR framework. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012998237