Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Antebellum critics of slavery argued that it was responsible for the relative inefficiency of free southern farms. We examine this issue, employing a stochastic production function, which allows us to distinguish between technological superiority and technical inefficiency, and controlling for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013237603
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009741210
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010366615
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001452073
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001459712
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001618983
Based on data from several samples of probate inventories we construct and analyze a time series of slave prices for South Carolina from 1722 to 1809. These estimates reveal that prices fluctuated without trend prior to the 1760s and then began to rise rapidly, more than doubling by the early...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013229847
Using data from samples of probate inventories we construct a series of slave prices for Low Country South Carolina and Georgia covering the period 1722-1815. Using these data we examine variations in slave prices by age and sex, as well as geographic variations between and within the two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013230411
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003413505
Between 1800 and 1860, mean adult stature of (U.S.) white males declined by nearly an inch, while real output grew substantially, creating the “Antebellum Puzzle.” In contrast, male slaves did not experience a comparable decrease in heights. To explain this puzzle within a puzzle, we show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010643036