Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009756616
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010345932
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009548942
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012121493
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009776456
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010500911
We study two related versions of the no-impatience postulate in the context of transitive and reflexive relations on infinite utility streams which are not necessarily complete. Both are excluded by the traditional (weak) anonymity axiom. We show explicit social welfare relations satisfying...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013057648
We show that the problem of evaluating infinite sequences (or streams) of utilities by a unique utility (or social welfare function) can be stated in terms of fuzzy subsets of the set of infinite utility sequences. For each stream, its evaluation can be viewed as its degree of membership to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011260074
This paper contributes to qualifying the Basu-Mitra approach to the problem of intergenerational social choice, by analyzing the impact of the structure of the feasible set of utilities on Banerjee's (2006) impossibility theorem. We prove that if the utilities that each generation can possess...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011113414
This paper investigates ethical aggregation of infinite utility streams by representable social welfare relations. We prove that the Hammond Equity postulate and other variations of it like the Pigou–Dalton transfer principle are incompatible with positive responsiveness to welfare...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010582588