Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010198103
The common use of majority rule in group decision making is puzzling. In theory, it inequitably favors the proposer, and paradoxically, it disadvantages voters further if they are inequity averse. In practice, however, outcomes are equitable. The present paper analyzes data from a novel...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011762571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012289867
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003243947
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010346331
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002125038
Why do people give when asked, but prefer not to be asked, and even take when possible? We show that standard behavioral axioms including separability, narrow bracketing, and scaling invariance predict these seemingly inconsistent observations. Specifically, these axioms imply that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011900073
Why do people give when asked, but prefer not to be asked, and even take when possible? We introduce a novel analytical framework that allows us to express context dependence and narrow bracketing axiomatically. We then derive the utility representation of distributive preferences additionally...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013193424
We assess the extent of preferences for employment in a collective wage bargaining situation with heterogeneous workers. We vary the size of the union and introduce a treatment mechanism transforming the voting game into an individual allocation task. Our results show that highly productive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013100408
We assess the extent of preferences for employment in a collective wage bargaining situation with heterogeneous workers. We vary the size of the union and introduce a treatment mechanism transforming the voting game into an individual allocation task. Our results show that highly productive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009656202