Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002034908
The traditional approach to flexible retirement (e.g. NDC) neglects the impact of asymmetric information on actuarial fairness (neutrality). The mechanism design approach (e.g. Diamond, 2003) gives up the requirement of neutrality and looks for a redistributive second-best benefit-retirement-age...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002523171
We analyze the impact of (exogenous) tax morale on the optimal design of progressive income taxation. In our model, only universal basic income (transfer) is financed from a linear income tax and the financing of public goods is neglected. Each individual supplies labor and (un)declares earning,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009307450
Pension systems fight myopia and reduce old-age poverty. Our simple model introduces heterogeneous wages, flexible labor supply, progressive personal income tax and pension credit. The socially optimal transfer system is close to the means-tested one proposed by Feldstein (1987). -- myopia ;...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009547252
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003399410
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001688318
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009304010
The traditional approach to flexible retirement (e.g. NDC) neglects the impact of asymmetric information on actuarial fairness (neutrality). The mechanism design approach (e.g. Diamond, 2003) gives up the requirement of neutrality and looks for a redistributive second-best benefit-retirement-age...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013318797
This paper applies the method of mechanism design to find optimal linear pension line rules (contribution rate and monthly benefit function) for flexible retirement: First the government announces a rule, making the benefit dependent on employment length. Individuals with different lifespans and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014103013