Showing 1 - 10 of 26
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014371687
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015401159
We study the random assignment of indivisible objects among a set of agents with strict preferences. We show that there exists no mechanism which is unanimous, strategy-proof and envy-free. Weakening the first requirement to q-unanimity - i.e., when every agent ranks a different object at the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013477533
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014330056
We study the random assignment of indivisible objects among a set of agents with strict preferences. Random Serial Dictatorship is known to be only ex-post efficient and there exist mechanisms which Pareto-dominate it ex ante. However, we show that there is no mechanism that is likewise (i)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014279888
We study the random assignment of indivisible objects among a set of agents with strict preferences. We show that there exists no mechanism which is unanimous, strategy-proof and envy-free. Weakening the first requirement to q-unanimity – i.e., when every agent ranks a different object at the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013191476
Consider a setting in which individual strict preferences need to be aggregated into a social strict preference relation. For two alternatives and an odd number of agents, it follows from May’s Theorem that the majority aggregation rule is the only one satisfying anonymity, neutrality, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014357423
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013161976
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009356253
In college admissions and student placements at public schools, the admission decision can be thought of as assigning indivisible objects with capacity constraints to a set of students such that each student receives at most one object and monetary compensations are not allowed. In these...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010222588