Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003405696
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003199030
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001574796
Domains of individual preferences for which the well-known impossibility Theorems of Gibbard-Satterthwaite and Muller-Satterthwaite do not hold are studied. First, we introduce necessary and sufficient conditions for a domain to admit non-dictatorial, Pareto efficient and either strategy-proof...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010316073
Domains of individual preferences for which the well-known impossibility Theorems of Gibbard-Satterthwaite and Muller-Satterthwaite do not hold are studied. First, we introduce necessary and sufficient conditions for a domain to admit non-dictatorial, Pareto efficient and either strategy-proof...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003923379
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003996590
Consider the problem of exact Nash implementation of social choice correspondences. Define a mechanism in which the planner can randomize on alternatives out of equilibrium while pure alternatives are always chosen in equilibrium. We call such a game form a lottery mechanism. When preferences...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014070475
Domains of individual preferences for which the well-known impossibility theorems of Gibbard-Satterthwaite and Muller-Satterthwaite do not hold are studied. To comprehend the limitations these results imply for social choice rules, we search for the largest domains that are possible. Here, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012720425
In the division problem with single-peaked preferences, it is well known that the uniform rule is robust to strategic manipulation. Furthermore, under efficiency and symmetry, it is the unique strategy-proof rule (Sprumont, 1991; Ching, 1994). We conversely analyze the consequences of strategic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012723481
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015071091