Showing 1 - 10 of 41
Using Monte Carlo experiments, we examine the performance of Indirect Inference tests of DSGE models, usually versions of the Smets-Wouters New Keynesian model of the US postwar period. We compare these with tests based on direct inference (using the Likelihood Ratio), and on the Del...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009563550
Using Monte Carlo experiments, we examine the performance of indirect inference tests of DSGE models in small samples, using various models in widespread use. We compare these with tests based on direct inference (using the Likelihood Ratio). We find that both tests have power so that a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010470917
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010495482
With Monte Carlo experiments on models in widespread use we examine the performance of indirect inference (II) tests of DSGE models in small samples. We compare these tests with ones based on direct inference (using the Likelihood Ratio, LR). We find that both tests have power so that a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011317836
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011591688
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011347424
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009581818
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009748700
A common practice in estimating parameters in DSGE models is to nd a set that when simulated gets close to an average of certain data moments; the model s simulated performance for other moments is then compared to the data for these as an informal test of the model. We call this procedure...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014077516
Maximum Likelihood (ML) shows both lower power and higher bias in small sample Monte Carlo experiments than Indirect Inference (II) and IIís higher power comes from its use of the model-restricted distribution of the auxiliary model coeffi cients (Le et al. 2016). We show here that IIís higher...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014433297