Showing 1 - 10 of 20
This article takes issue with a recent book by Ziliak and McCloskey (2008) of the same title. Ziliak and McCloskey argue that statistical significance testing is a barrier rather than a booster for empirical research in economics and should therefore be abandoned altogether. The present article...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008990059
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001473469
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001601950
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001742246
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001982685
This article takes issue with a recent book by Ziliak and McCloskey (2008) of the same title. Ziliak and McCloskey argue that statistical significance testing is a barrier rather than a booster for empirical research in many fields and should therefore be abandoned altogether. The present...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013135915
This article takes issue with a recent book by Ziliak and McCloskey (2008) of the same title. Ziliak and McCloskey argue that statistical significance testing is a barrier rather than a booster for empirical research in economics and should therefore be abandoned altogether. The present article...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013121200
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009372977
We derive the limiting null distributions of the standard and OLS based CUSUM-tests for structural change of the coecients of a linear regression model in the context of long memory disturbances. We show that both tests behave fundamentally different in a long memory environment, as compared to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009783563
The paper considers tests against for autocorrelation among the disturbances in linear regression models that can be expressed as ratios of quadratic forms. It shows that such tests are in general not unbiased and that power can even drop to zero for certain regressors and spatial weight...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009770908