Showing 1 - 10 of 14
This study investigates why newly listed firms become M&A targets shortly after their initial public offering (IPOs) from the perspective of product innovation. We find strong empirical evidence that IPOs with less established trademarks increase the likelihood of becoming IPO targets. We also...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013308400
This paper explores whether and how political connections affect the likelihood of completing a cross-border M&A deal for Chinese publicly listed, but privately-owned enterprises (POEs) and the resulting firm performance. In line with our proposed political connection trade-off theory, we find...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012932569
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012098857
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013209822
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012886914
We examine derivatives trading prior to takeover rumors in a sample of 1,638 publicly traded U.S. firms. The volume of options traded is abnormally high over the 5-day pre-rumor period, primarily due to the number of out-of-the-money call options traded. In addition, the direction of option...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014238260
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015152701
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012006464
This paper investigates whether shareholder class action litigation affects the takeover candidacy, premium, and completion rate of mergers and acquisitions involving defendant target firms. We use a comprehensive data set of publicly traded U.S. firms that became the targets of takeover bids...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013244945
We examine insider trading surrounding takeover rumors in a sample of 1,642 publicly traded U.S. firms. Using difference-in-differences regressions, we find that insider net purchases increase within the year prior to the first publication of a takeover rumor, particularly when rumor articles...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012828616