Showing 1 - 10 of 377
In this paper we apply conjoint analysis as an empirical method to study the influence of tax labeling and tax earmarking on the perceived tax burden. As reference for the individual behavior we use the model of a rational utility maximizer described by the economic theory. We determine a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010300714
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010196960
In this paper we apply conjoint analysis as an empirical method to study the influence of tax labeling and tax earmarking on the perceived tax burden. As reference for the individual behavior we use the model of a rational utility maximizer described by the economic theory. We determine a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003962952
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001453281
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001673836
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013385371
In 2005, Austria modified its group taxation regime and now provides an option for crossborder loss-offset. We analyse the combined impact of Austria's new group taxation and lossoffset limitations on cross-border investment decisions of domestic corporations. Monte Carlo simulations in an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261305
In 2005, Austria modified its group taxation regime and now provides an option for crossborder loss-offset. We analyse the combined impact of Austria's new group taxation and lossoffset limitations on cross-border investment decisions of domestic corporations. Monte Carlo simulations in an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003113107
In 2005, Austria modified its group taxation regime and now provides an option for cross-border loss-offset. We analyse the combined impact of Austria's new group taxation and loss-offset limitations on cross-border investment decisions of domestic corporations. Monte Carlo simulations in an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003084481