Showing 1 - 10 of 17
We claim that understanding human decisions requires that both automatic and deliberate processes be considered. First, we sketch the qualitative differences between two hypothetical processing systems, an automatic and a deliberate system. Second, we show the potential that connectionism offers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264831
Brandstätter, Gigerenzer and Hertwig (2006) put forward the priority heuristic (PH) as a fast and frugal heuristic for decisions under risk. According to the PH, individuals do not make trade-offs between gains and probabilities, as proposed by expected utility models such as cumulative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264834
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001401381
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000998046
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000998178
We claim that understanding human decisions requires that both automatic and deliberate processes be considered. First, we sketch the qualitative differences between two hypothetical processing systems, an automatic and a deliberate system. Second, we show the potential that connectionism offers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014220471
We claim that understanding human decisions requires that both automatic and deliberate processes be considered. First, we sketch the qualitative differences between two hypothetical processing systems, an automatic and a deliberate system. Second, we show the potential that connectionism offers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003730509
Brandstätter, Gigerenzer and Hertwig (2006) put forward the priority heuristic (PH) as a fast and frugal heuristic for decisions under risk. According to the PH, individuals do not make trade-offs between gains and probabilities, as proposed by expected utility models such as cumulative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003730615
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008797065
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008797803