Educational interventions are often narrowly targeted and temporary, and evaluations often focus on the short-run impacts of the intervention. Insofar as the positive effects of educational interventions fadeout over time, however, such assessments may be misleading. In this paper, we develop a...

Hyperbolic discounting (H) is currently the dominant behavioral model of intertemporal choice, since it better explains how people behave than the normatively correct exponential discounting model (E). This paper promotes an arithmetic discounting model (A) which challenges H. First, A is more...

We examine the confounding between models of intertemporal choice. Critical outputs from hyperbolic, exponential and arithmetic discounting are all highly multicolinear in commonly used research designs. This confounding means that if one model defines a participant as impulsive, they all will:...

The paper surveys over twenty models of delay discounting (also known as temporal discounting, time preference, time discounting), that psychologists and economists have put forward to explain the way people actually trade off time and money. Using little more than the basic algebra of powers...

The paper presents an unusually comprehensive empirical comparison of delay discounting/intertemporal choice models. A three-component model is developed, with power laws modeling subjective time, subjective money, and magnitude sensitivity. It nests several other models in the literature, among...

This paper has four objectives. First, we describe and evaluate three models of delay discounting (time preference), showing how they relate to each other and to already established concepts in accounting/finance and elsewhere. The models are: exponential (E), hyperbolic (H), and arithmetic (A),...