Showing 1 - 10 of 42
This paper assumes that groups of consumers in network markets can coordinate their choices when it is in their best interest to do so, and when coordination does not require communication. It is shown that multiple asymmetric networks can coexist in equilibrium if consumers have heterogeneous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002521214
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002396012
This paper assumes that groups of consumers in network markets can coordinate their choices when it is in their best interest to do so, and when coordination does not require communication. It is shown that multiple asymmetric networks can coexist in equilibrium if consumers have heterogeneous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002484326
This paper analyzes pricing decisions and competition in network markets, assuming that groups of consumers can coordinate their choices when it is in their interest, if coordination does not require communication. It is shown that multiple asymmetric networks can coexist in equilibrium. A...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003441183
We provide a microfoundation for a weighted utilitarian social welfare function that reflects common moral intuitions about interpersonal comparisons of utilities. If utility is only ordinal, interpersonal comparisons are meaningless. Nonetheless, economics often adopts utilitarian welfare...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012919217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010234235
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010496435
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011847293
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012298770
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012034538