Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001330746
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003905873
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011283058
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011581782
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011581784
A vast literature following Hayn [1995] and Burgstahler and Dichev [1997] attributed the so-called “discontinuities” in earnings distributions around zero to earnings management. Despite recent evidence that these discontinuities are likely caused by other factors, researchers and teachers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013152322
A vast literature following Hayn [1995] and Burgstahler and Dichev [1997] attributed the so-called 'discontinuities' in earnings distributions around zero to earnings management. Despite recent evidence that these discontinuities are likely caused by other factors, researchers and teachers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013158288
We extend Easton's (2007) review of the literature on accounting-based estimates of the expected rate of return on equity capital, which we refer to as the ERR. We begin by reiterating the reasons why accounting-based estimates are used. Next, we briefly review the recent literature that focuses...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013022680
Recent literature has used analysts' earnings forecasts, which are known to be optimistic, to estimate implied expected rates of return; yielding upwardly biased estimates. We estimate that the bias, computed as the difference between the estimates of the implied expected rate of return based on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014052171
On average, across the years 1980 to 2018, almost 8.5 percent of firms on the Compustat Annual data set, which had earnings observations in year t-1, did not have earnings observations in year t. Because these disappearances were not random, there is attrition bias in estimates of earnings...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012853725