Showing 1 - 10 of 180
This appendix to the paper “Belief elicitation in experiments: Is there a hedging problem?” (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1557803) reports further details of procedures and results, in particular for treatments that are only briefly summarized in the paper. Furthermore, we document in detail...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014197658
Belief-elicitation experiments usually reward accuracy of stated beliefs in addition to payments for other decisions. But this allows risk-averse subjects to hedge with their stated beliefs against adverse outcomes of the other decisions. So can we trust the existing belief-elicitation results?...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013147495
Belief elicitation in economics experiments usually relies on paying subjects according to the accuracy of stated beliefs in addition to payments for other decisions. Such incentives, however, allow risk-averse subjects to hedge with their stated beliefs against adverse outcomes of other...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013325138
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002136359
In theory, the incidence of a tax should be independent of which side of the market it is levied on. This principle of liability side equivalence underlies virtually all theories of tax incidence. Policy discussions, however, tend to place great emphasis on the legal division of tax payments. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009582390
In this experiment, we analyze the model of strategic trade policy proposed by Brander and Spencer (1985). Governments can choose whether or not to subsidize domestic firms. Firms compete in a Cournot duopoly, and they know the subsidy decisions when choosing output. Although the theoretical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014066578
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001480659
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001818327
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001673959
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001497283