Showing 1 - 10 of 10
This theoretical paper presents an incentive salience model of intertemporal choice. The model is a variation of the quasi-hyperbolic discounting model. Based on the distinction between "wanting" and "liking", the paper presents one possible explanation of impulsive choices of smaller sooner...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009409727
This paper presents a formal model in which differential satiation dynamics of various consumer needs translate into long-run changes of consumer behavior when income rises. In the model individuals allocate their income to the consumption categories proportional to need deprivation states...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009671382
Behavioral economics has shown that individuals sometimes make decisions that are not in their best interests. This insight has prompted calls for behaviorally informed policy interventions popularized under the notion of "libertarian paternalism." This type of "soft" paternalism aims at helping...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013053998
The paper deals with impulsive consumption and highlights the roles that cognitive and motivational aspects of reflexive thought (namely self-control and self-image motives, respectively) play in intertemporal decisions. While self-control inhibits individuals from consuming impulsively,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009504633
The model of time-inconsistent procrastination by O'Donoughe and Rabin shows that individuals who are not aware of their present-bias (nai͏̈ve) procrastinate more than individuals who are aware of it (sophisticated) or are not present-biased (time-consistent). This paper tests this prediction....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011648423
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011806080
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012601477
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015330210
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013473307
We design and implement the first real-effort experiment that can jointly estimate present bias (β) and sophistication (bβ), with separate preference parameters for money (βm, bβm) and effort (βe, bβe). In our study, participants chose to (and predicted to) complete 14% (and 10%) fewer...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014444409