Showing 1 - 10 of 70
Traditional life-cycle models conclude that individuals should be fully invested in stocks when young -- in stark contrast to observed stock holdings -- and then gradually replace stocks with bonds as retirement is approaching. We show that a carefully specified and calibrated model of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012932914
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012312632
We analyze the portfolio planning problem of an ambiguity averse investor. The stock follows a jump-diffusion process, and there is ambiguity about the drift of the stock and the intensity of jumps. The consequences of ambiguity with respect to jump and diffusion risk are by no means the same....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013112620
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009489609
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010350862
In a rich, calibrated life-cycle model, we show that well-designed mandatory pension plans significantly improve the welfare of individuals procrastinating on savings or not investing in stocks, and even improve rational individuals' welfare through a return tax advantage and fair annuitization....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012848741
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014465425
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009729098
We analyze the optimal stock-bond portfolio under both learning and ambiguity aversion. Stock returns are predictable by an observable and an unobservable predictor, and the investor has to learn about the latter. Furthermore, the investor is ambiguity-averse and has a preference for investment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012857427
We determine the optimal investment strategy for an ambiguity averse investor in a setting with stochastic interest rates. The investor is assumed to be ambiguous about the expected rate of return of both bonds and stocks, and may have different levels of ambiguity aversion about the two types...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013121162