Showing 1 - 10 of 144
We study gender differences in relation to performance and sabotage in competitions. While we find no systematic gender differences in performance in the real effort task, we observe a strong gender gap in sabotage choices in our experiment. This gap is rooted in the uncertainty about the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012892013
We study risk-taking behavior in a simple two person tournament in a theoretical model as well as a laboratory experiment. First, a model is analyzed in which two agents simultaneously decide between a risky and a safe strategy and we allow for all possible degrees of correlation between the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013325296
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008666208
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009621701
We study risk-taking behavior in a simple two person tournament in a theoretical model as well as a laboratory experiment. First, a model is analyzed in which two agents simultaneously decide between a risky and a safe strategy and we allow for all possible degrees of correlation between the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003748469
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011592394
There are plenty of human-centred research questions in production science. So far, the focus of the analysis is skewed towards technical considerations. Decision experiments, however, provide a promising approach to gain insights from a human perspective by using learning factories as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013294812
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001450841
This paper discusses the strategic role of mismatching, where players voluntarily form inefficient teams or forego the formation of efficient teams, respectively. Strategic mismatching can be rational when players realize a competitive advantage (e.g. harming other competitors). In addition, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001442145
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001395337